New Call
The business model needs to be translated into responsibility, payment, exit and information protection.
Key questions to clarify, documents to prepare and the way we approach the matter before an irreversible decision is made.
A short introduction to our process: how the initial review begins, what we need to understand and what happens after your first inquiry.
The legal solution should protect the business and also match the pace of operations, flows and commercial relations.
Start with facts and documents, define what needs to be achieved, and only then choose the legal move. This way you can identify early what might delay the move and what can be resolved in advance.
A shareholder dispute is not resolved only through a firm letter. It is necessary to understand who holds the voting power, what is written in the regulations and agreements, where the business is actually harmed, and what move creates correct pressure without burning a possibility of settlement.
In shareholder disputes the real damage is usually created before the verdict: accounts that are not disclosed, decisions that are made behind the back, irregular salaries, the use of company funds or a situation in which neither party can move the business forward.
The legal guidance begins with mapping the power centers: holding percentages, signature rights, board of directors, regulations, founder agreements, owner loans, personal guarantees and company assets. Only after understanding the map can one choose whether it is right to go to negotiations, temporary relief, a claim to remove deprivation, pricing or liquidation.
When two parties block each other, they examine decision mechanisms, signature rights, and the possibility of appointing an outside party or the pricing.
Check whether one party excludes the other from information, withdraws funds, changes wages, or transfers activity to a related company.
Sometimes the right solution is not a long war but a purchase mechanism, valuation and schedules that protect the business.
Instead of responding to any provocation, an order of actions is being constructed: what is being demanded now, what must be documented, when a procedure is being served, and when it is actually appropriate to open a hard-fought negotiation about separation or acquisition.
No. Sometimes a well-established demand letter, document discovery, and a proposal for a purchase mechanism create a solution faster than a full procedure.
When there is concern about money transfer, change of control, deletion of information or action that may render the damage irreversible.
Conflict between partners or shareholders is one of the key risks in any company. While in most cases the partnership begins with trust and cooperation, in practice – almost every business reaches a point of friction at one point or another.
The difference between a society that is falling apart and a society that is growing – lies in the ability to manage the conflict in a smart, strategic and progressive way.
A dispute between partners is not only a legal problem – it is a direct risk to the operation of the business. It can lead to decision-making paralysis, damage to flows, loss of customers and even collapse of the company.
Therefore, companies and entrepreneurs today understand that proper management of the relationship between shareholders is an integral part of business risk management.
The key to conflict prevention is proper planning. Companies that carry out proper legal planning manage to prevent most disputes before they develop.
When the conflict is already present, it is necessary to act accurately: not out of emotion, but out of business understanding. Any legal action should also be examined in the economic aspect and control of society.
If any of these situations are familiar to you, it is best to check the image before continuing.
The business model needs to be translated into responsibility, payment, exit and information protection.
Actual execution has moved away from the text or one of the parties does not meet the obligations.
It is required to choose between series, demand, collection, temporary relief or legal process.
You don't have to come up with a perfect case, these are the starting points that help you understand what's missing and what's important.
Only services that have a direct connection to the issue at hand.
Litigation strategy for refunds and compensation for violations.
For service ←Drafting and reviewing contracts that protect business interests.
For service ←Current legal advice, agreements, regulation and risk management.
For service ←
A practical guide to reviewing contracts, evidence, risk and available options before pursuing a commercial dispute.
It is often said that lawyers are exploitative and unfair people. This office came to erase this stigma. The entire staff there is lovely, and they do their job faithfully. In my case, I dealt with Attorney Hussam Armali, and I must say that I have never met such an honest, decent, and goal-oriented person. Thank you very much from the bottom of my heart 🙏
I contacted Karen just to figure out whether it was worth selling a piece of land we inherited or keeping it. She sat down with me and explained the whole picture – rights, taxation, what can be done in the future. She didn’t try to push in a certain direction, and that was the most important thing to me.
Karin Amsalem, a professional and thorough attorney of the highest level! Represented us in the process of selling a plot of land that we won in a tender. This is a complex process that includes registering lease rights in the Land Registry, payments to the Land Registry such as consent fees, refunding subsidies for housing and construction, as well as handling the appreciation tax, which includes many expenses. Karin managed the entire process with professionalism, accuracy and attention to detail, while fully protecting our interests as sellers. Throughout the entire process, we felt that we had someone to trust. Highly recommend her!